J Med Phys Close
 

Figure 5: 2D profile comparison of TPS, unprocessed profile of I知RT MatriXX without any shift of position and rocessed profile of I知RT MatriXX using multiple profiles acquisition at four different positions [(0,0); (3.81 mm, 0); (0, 3.81 mm) and (3.81 mm, 3.81 mm)]. Figure 5a represents the 1D profile comparison of TPS 2D dose map (b), unprocessed (c) and processed (d) 2D dose maps of I知RT MatriXX. Improvement of gamma histogram evaluation (delta distance = 3 mm and delta dose = 3%) by 5% from (e) TPS vs. unprocessed 2D profile to (f) TPS vs. processed 2D profile

Figure 5: 2D profile comparison of TPS, unprocessed profile of I知RT MatriXX without any shift of position and  rocessed profile of I知RT MatriXX using multiple profiles acquisition at four different positions [(0,0); (3.81 mm, 0); (0, 3.81 mm) and (3.81 mm, 3.81 mm)]. Figure 5a represents the 1D profile comparison of TPS 2D dose map (b), unprocessed (c) and processed (d) 2D dose maps of I知RT MatriXX. Improvement of gamma histogram evaluation (delta distance = 3 mm and delta dose = 3%) by 5% from (e) TPS vs. unprocessed 2D profile to (f) TPS vs. processed 2D profile