|Year : 2013 | Volume
| Issue : 2 | Page : 93-97
Natural radionuclide and radiological assessment of building materials in high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran
Elham Bavarnegin1, Masoud Vahabi Moghaddam1, Nasrin Fathabadi2
1 Department of Physics, University of Guilan, Rasht, Iran
2 Environmental Radiological Protection Division, National Radiation Protection Department, Iran Nuclear Regulatory Authority, Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, End of Northern Kargar Street, Tehran, Iran
|Date of Submission||05-Sep-2012|
|Date of Decision||08-Jan-2013|
|Date of Acceptance||08-Jan-2013|
|Date of Web Publication||3-May-2013|
Department of Physics, University of Guilan, Rasht
Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None
| Abstract|| |
Building materials, collected from different sites in Ramsar, a northern coastal city in Iran, were analyzed for their natural radionuclide contents. The measurements were carried out using a high resolution high purity Germanium (HPGe) gamma-ray spectrometer system. The activity concentration of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K content varied from below the minimum detection limit up to 86,400 Bqkg -1 , 187 Bqkg -1 , and 1350 Bqkg -1 , respectively. The radiological hazards incurred from the use of these building materials were estimated through various radiation hazard indices. The result of this survey shows that values obtained for some samples are more than the internationally accepted maximum limits and as such, the use of them as a building material pose significant radiation hazard to individuals.
Keywords: Ramsar, building materials, gamma spectrometry, hazard indices
|How to cite this article:|
Bavarnegin E, Moghaddam MV, Fathabadi N. Natural radionuclide and radiological assessment of building materials in high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran. J Med Phys 2013;38:93-7
|How to cite this URL:|
Bavarnegin E, Moghaddam MV, Fathabadi N. Natural radionuclide and radiological assessment of building materials in high background radiation areas of Ramsar, Iran. J Med Phys [serial online] 2013 [cited 2022 Sep 26];38:93-7. Available from: https://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2013/38/2/93/111325
| Introduction|| |
The natural radioactivity present in the environment is the main source of radiation exposure for humans and constitutes the background radiation level.  The main natural contributors to external exposure from gamma rays are 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K. Since these radionuclides are not uniformly distributed, the knowledge of their distribution in soil and rocks play an important role in radiation protection and measurement. It is important to determine the sources and their individual contributions to the total radiation dose.  In a typical environment, respective contribution to radiation exposure is about 13.8% for 40 K, 55.5% for 226 Ra, and 14% for 232 Th. The worldwide mean dose rate from terrestrial radionuclides is about 60 nGy -1 for areas with normal background. 
Life evolved in an environment with higher radiation levels than exist today, and background radiation levels today are lower than at any time in the history of life on Earth. Natural radioactivity and the respective external exposition of the population depend on the geological and geographical conditions of the region. ,, Areas with unusually high background radiation are found in Yangjiang, China; Kerala, India; Guarapari, Brazil; and Ramsar, Iran. The high background radiation in the Ramsar can be considered to be first due to the presence of considerable amount of 226 Ra along with its decay products brought to the Earth surface by numerous hot springs, radium is dissolved from the rocks by hot ground water, and second due to some travertine deposits having high thorium concentration.
Residents of these "hot" areas have used the local stone as a convenient building material to construct houses. , Building materials are the main source of indoor gamma radiation. All stone-based building materials contain radioactive nuclides, which contribute to radiation exposure. Knowledge of the level of natural radioactivity in building materials is then important to assess the possible radiological hazards to human health and to develop standards and guidelines for the use and management of these materials. 
Over the years, particular attention had been drawn to the measurement of activity levels of building materials; several authors have studied the activity concentrations of various building materials such as concrete, soil, sediment, sand, marble, granite, ceramic tiles. ,,,,,,,,, The main objectives of this research is to quantify the inventories of natural radionuclides in building material samples used in Ramsar and to estimate the radiological impacts that may accrue to the dwellers in buildings constructed with these materials.
| Materials and Methods|| |
Thirty-five building material samples were collected from different parts of Ramsar (19 local building materials and 16 market available materials). The study area is situated in the north of Iran, between longitudes 50°21′ to 50°46′ East of the Greenwich meridian and latitudes 36°34′ to 36°58′ North of Equator [Figure 1].
|Figure 1: Study area and the distribution of local building material samples|
Click here to view
The commonly used market available building materials were marble, granite, brick, Travertine, block, concrete, gypsum, and mosaic which were collected randomly from sites where housing was under construction. Residents of Ramsar have also used the local stone as a convenient building material to construct houses. In selection process of natural building materials, a fully portable handheld scintillometer (NaI) was used. The system was calibrated against a 137 Cs standard and daily checked for stability using a low activity 137 Cs (9 kBq) radioactive source.
Collected samples were first ground to fine powder, dried, weighed (300 gr) and then covered securely and placed in polyethylene cylindrical gas-tight containers three weeks prior to counting. At the end of this in-growth period, the samples were counted for 3-16 h.
The activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K in collected samples were determined using a Canberra High Purity Germanium (HPGe) detector. The detector was surrounded by a massive lead shield (10 cm) with internal walls of electrolytic copper and cadmium and coupled to a Canberra MCA-Series 100. The system was calibrated with respect to energy and efficiency using standard sources. The relative efficiency of detector is 40%, and its energy resolution is 2 keV at full width half maximum (FWHM) from 1332 keV energy of 60 Co.
Assuming secular equilibrium in the uranium and thorium decay series, the 226 Ra was determined by means of its progeny photo peak: 214 Bi (609 keV) and 232 Th was analyzed by means of its progenies photo peaks: 208 Tl (583 keV) and 228 Ac (911 keV). The activity of 40 K was measured directly through its 1461 keV peak.  The minimum detection limit (MDL) for 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K are estimated to be 1.4, 3.04, and 2.83 Bqkg -1 respectively.
| Results and Discussion|| |
The measured specific activities of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K, in samples collected from different locations of Ramsar, which are organized as the frequencies of activity intervals, are presented in [Figure 2]. The geometric mean (GM) with its standard deviation (GSD) and the ranges of specific activities are given in [Table 1].
|Table 1: Geometric mean and range of specific activities of concerned radionuclides in building material samples collected from different areas of Ramsar|
Click here to view
The world average specific activity values of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K are 35, 35, and 400 Bqkg -1 , respectively, as reported by UNSCEAR 2000.  It can be observed from the results that the geometric mean specific activity of 226 Ra in the study area is much higher than the worldwide average value of 35 Bqkg -1 . The study can, therefore, be regarded as an area with high background radiation.
The amounts of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K for each sample are presented in our previous paper. 
It is important to have an assessment of the radiological hazard associated with the exposure to the radiation from 40 K, 226 Ra, and 232 Th. To account for the collective effect of the activity concentrations of these radionuclides in a material, a single quantity termed as "hazard index" is defined. Different hazard indices, such as Radium equivalent activity (Ra eq ), external radiation hazard (H ex ), gamma index ( Iγ), and alpha index ( Iγ), are used for the assessment of radiological hazard of building materials. Based on the activity concentration obtained from collected building material samples of Ramsar, and applying the appropriate formulae, hazard indices were calculated. These indices have been described in many papers. ,,,,
Radium equivalent activity (Ra eq )
Radium equivalent activity is an index that has been introduced to represent the specific activities of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K by a single quantity, which takes into account the radiation hazards associated with them. The Ra eq is related to the external gamma dose and internal dose due to radon and its daughter.
The maximum value of Ra eq must be less than 370 Bqkg -1 . This index is given as follows: 
where A Ra , A Th , and A K are the activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K, respectively. The Ra eq for building material samples of Ramsar ranged from 0.34 to 86400 Bqkg -1 with the geometric mean value of 144.80 Bqkg -1 . The Ra eq value in some samples is more than maximum limit of 370 Bqkg -1 suggested by UNSCEAR for the safe use of building material. The mean and range of Ra eq obtained for the analyzed samples (using equation 1) are presented in [Table 2].
|Table 2: Mean and range of radiation hazard indices measured in building material samples|
Click here to view
External Hazard Index (Hex)
The external hazard (H ex ) index is another radiation hazard index defined by Beretka and Mathew to evaluate the indoor radiation dose rate due to the external exposure to gamma radiation from the natural radionuclides in building materials of dwellings.  This index value must be less than unity to keep the radiation hazard insignificant. This index is given as follows.
where A Ra , A Th, and A K are the activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K, respectively. The mean and ranges of H ex for the studied samples are also given in [Table 2]. Results show that the values of H ex in 7 of local samples are more than unity. These samples were collected from Taleshmahalleh (L1 (233.51 Bqkg -1 ), L5 (1.13 Bqkg -1 ), L6 (58.64 Bqkg -1 ), Absiah L9 (26.06 Bqkg -1 ) and Khaksefid (L7 (60.81 Bqkg -1 ), L18 (2.27 BqKg -1 ), L19 (98.91 Bqkg -1 ). Values of H ex in these samples indicate that the radiation hazards arising from the use of these samples is high. L1, L5, L6, L7, L9, L7, L18, and L19 are codes of local samples. See our previous paper. 
Gamma Index (Iγ)
Iγ, the radiation hazard index proposed by the European Commission, can be used to estimate the gamma- radiation hazard levels typically for those associated with the natural radionuclides. This index takes into account the ways and quantities in which materials are utilized in building, and it is given as follows. 
where A Ra , A Th , and A K are the activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K, respectively. The value of Iγ ≤ 0.5 corresponds to a dose rate criterion of 0.3 mSvy -1 , whereas 0.5 ≤ Iγ corresponds to a criterion of 1 mSvy -1 . Materials with Iγ > 1.0 should be avoided in building construction. They will deliver an effective dose rate higher than 1 mSvy -1 to the occupants of such buildings. ,
The range and mean of Iγ for collected samples of building material in Ramsar are given in [Table 2]. The values of Iγ in 8 of local samples are more than unity. These samples were collected from Taleshmahalleh (L1 (288 Bqkg -1 ), L5 (1.48 Bqkg -1 ), L6 (72.33 Bqkg -1 )), Absiah (L9 (32.16 Bqkg -1 ), L16 (1.08 Bqkg -1 )) and Khaksefid (L7 (75 Bqkg -1 ), L18 (2.94 BqKg -1 ), L19 (122 Bqkg -1 )). Value of in these samples are more than unity and increase the annual effective dose to a member of the public by more than 1 mSvy -1 . And, according to the European Commission report, such materials should be avoided in building construction. L1, L5, L6, L7, L9, L16, L18, and L19 are codes of local samples. See our previous paper. 
Alpha index (Iα)
The excess alpha radiation due to radon inhalation originating from building materials is estimated through the alpha index ( Iα), which is defined as follows. ,
where A Ra is the activity concentration of 226 Ra. The recommended maximum concentration of 226 Ra is 200 Bqkg -1 , which gives Iα = 1. When the 226 Ra activity concentration of any building material exceeds this maximum value (200 Bqkg -1 ), it is possible that radon exhalation from such material could cause the indoor radon concentration to exceed 200 Bqkg -1 . The range and mean values of Iα obtained from the concentrations of 226 Ra in Ramsar building material are presented in [Table 2]. Values obtained for Iα in 7 of local samples are more than unity. These samples were collected from Taleshmahalleh (L1 (432 Bqkg -1 ), L6 (108 Bqkg -1 )), Absiah (L9 (48 Bqkg -1 ), L16 (1.58)) and Khaksefid (L7 (112.50 Bqkg -1 ), L18 (2.37 BqKg -1 ), L19 (183 Bqkg -1 )). It can, therefore, be said that radon inhalation from buildings constructed with these materials is so large as to warrant restriction of their use in building construction. There is more information about Radon exhalation rate in building materials of Ramsar in our previous study. 
| Conclusions|| |
The activity concentrations of 226 Ra, 232 Th, and 40 K have been measured in 35 building material samples collected from different areas in Ramsar, Iran, using gamma ray spectrometry. Results indicate that the measured mean value for 226 Ra specific activity is more than the world average of 35 Bqkg -1 . Especially 8 samples collected from Taleshmahalleh, Absiah, and Khaksefid had very high radioactivity. According to the results, Ramsar can be regarded as a region with high background radiation areas. The radiological implications of using these building materials were examined through the estimation of various radiation hazard indices and dose rates. The results in some samples were above the maximum permissible limits of these indices. It can, therefore, be concluded that an assessment of the radiological hazard of using these building materials is crucial. The use of these building materials, especially local ones with high radiation hazard indices as a result of high activity concentrations, should be restricted, and in some cases, it should be forbidden.
According to the results, the use of some local building materials in Ramsar is discouraged, and the replacement of them by building materials with low radioactivity contents is recommended.
| Acknowledgment|| |
The authors gratefully acknowledge the contribution of those colleagues involved in the environmental radioactivity survey program especially M. Vasheghani Farahani and M. Moradi
| References|| |
|1.||Bozkurt A, Yorulmaz N, Kam E, Karahan G, Osmanlioglu AE: Assessment of environmental radioactivity for Sanliurfa region of southeastern Turkey. Radiat Meas 2007, 42:1387-1391. |
|2.||Sowmya M, Senthilkumar B, Seshan BR, Hariharan G, Purvaja R, Ramkumar S, et al. Natural radioactivity and associated dose rates in soil samples from Kalpakkan, South India. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;141:239-47. |
|3.||Isinkaye MO, Shitta MB. Natural radionuclide content and radiological assessment of clay soils collected from different sites in Ekiti state, Southwestern Nigeria. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;139:590-6. |
|4.||Mohanty AK, Sengupta D, Das SK, Saha SK, Van KV. Natural radioactivity and radiation exposure in the high background area at Chhatrapur beach placer deposit of Orissa, India. J Environ Radioact 2004;75:15-33. |
|5.||Karam PA, Leslie SA. Calculations of background beta-gamma radiation dose through geologic time. Health Phys 1999;77:662-7. |
|6.||Merdanoðlu B, Altinsoy N. Radioactivity concentrations and dose assessment for soil samples from Kestanbol, granite area. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2006;121:399-405. |
|7.||Langmuir D. Uranium solution-mineral equilibria at low temperatures with applications to sedimentary ore deposits. Geochim Cosmochim Acta 1978;42:547-69. |
|8.||Sohrabi M. Recent radiological studies of high level natural radiation areas of Ramsar. Proceeding of international conference on high levels of natural radiation, Ramsar, Iran. Vienna: IAEA; 1990: 3-7. |
|9.||Turhan S, Baykan UN, Sen K. Measurement of the natural radioactivity in building materials used in Ankara and assessment of external doses. J Radiol Prot 2008;28:83-91. |
|10.||Xinwei L. Radioactive analysis of cement and its products collected from Shaanxi, China. Health Phys 2005;88:84-6. |
|11.||Ahad AM, Rehman S, Rehman S, Faheem M. Measurement of radioactivity in soil of Bahawapur division, Pakistan. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004;112:443-7. |
|12.||Farai IP, Isinkaye MO. Radiological safety assessment of surface- water dam sediments used as building material in southwestern Nigeria. J Radiol Prot 2009;29:85-93. |
|13.||Veiga R, Veiga R, Sanches N, Anjos RM, Macario K, Bastos J, et al. Measurement of natural radioactivity in Brazilian beach sands. Radiat Meas 2006;41:189-96. |
|14.||Iqba M, Tufail M, Mirza SM. Measurement of natural radioactivity in marble found in Pakistan using a NaI (Tl) gamma-ray spectrometer. J Environ Radioact 2000;51:255-65. |
|15.||Xinwei L. Radioactivity level of Chinese building ceramic tile. Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2004;112:323-7. |
|16.||Xinwei L, Lingqing W, Xiaodan J. Radiometric analysis of Chinese commercial granites. J Radioanalytic Nucl Chem 2006;267:669-73. |
|17.||Tufail M, Akhtar N, Javied S, Hamid T. Natural radioactivity hazards of building bricks fabricated available from saline soil of two districts of Pakistan. J Radiol Prot 2007;27:481-92. |
|18.||Flores OB, Estrada AM, Suarez RR, Zerquera JT, Perez AH. Natural radionuclide content in building materials and gamma dose rate in dwellings in Cuba. J Environ Radioact 2008;99:1834-7. |
|19.||Hewamanna R, Sumithrarachchi CS, Mahawatte P, Nanayakkara HL, Ratnayake HC. Natural radioactivity and gamma dose from Sri Lankan clay bricks used in building construction. Appl Radiat Isot 2001;54:365-9. |
|20.||Nejad MG, Beitollahi MM, Fallahian N, Amidi J, Ramezani H. Concentration of natural radionuclides in imported mineral substances. Environ Int 2001;26:1-4. |
|21.||United Nations Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCEAR). Sources and effects of ionizing radiation, Annex A and B. New York: United Nations; 2000; 6-9. |
|22.||Bavarnegin E, Fathabadi N, Moghaddam MV, Farahani MV, Moradi M, Babakhni A. Radon exhalation rate and natural radionuclide content in building materials of high background areas of Ramsar, Iran. J Environ Radioact 2012 [Vol 117 p 36-40]. |
|23.||Asghar M, Tufail M, Sabiha J, Abid A, Waqas M. Radiological implications of granite of northern Pakistan. J Radiol Prot 2008;28:387-99. |
|24.||Tufail M, Akhtar N, Waqas M. Radioactive rock phosphate: The feed stock of phosphate fertilizers used in Pakistan. Health Phys 2006;90:361-70. |
|25.||El-Arabi AM, Ra TK. Concentrations in igneous rocks from eastern desert Egypt and its radiological implications. Radiat Meas 2007;42:94-100. |
|26.||Righi S, Bruzzi L. Natural radioactivity and radon exhalation in building materials used in Italian dwellings. J Environ Radioact 2006;88:158-70. |
|27.||Berekta J, Matthew P. Natural radioactivity of Australian building materials, industrial wastes and by-products. Health Phys 1985;48:87-95. |
|28.||European Commission (EC) report on radiological protection principles concerning the natural radioactivity of building materials. Radiation Protection No.112. Luxembourg: Directorate-General Environment, Nuclear Safety and Civil Protection; 1999: 6-9. |
[Figure 1], [Figure 2]
[Table 1], [Table 2]
|This article has been cited by|
||Radioactivity and Environmental Impacts of Granites from Um Ara, Southeastern Desert, Egypt
| ||El-Afandy A. H, Mohamed G. El-Feky, Samia H. Taha, S. M. El Minyawi, H. A. Sallam, A. F. Tawfic, A. Omar, M. G. El-Samrah |
| ||Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2022; 2305(1): 012033 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Determination of Activity Concentration of Natural Radionuclides and Radiation Hazards Assessment of Building Materials in High Background Radiation Areas of Homa and Ruri, Kenya
| ||Willis Otieno Gor Odongo, Margaret Chege, Nadir Hashim, Shinji Tokonami, Kranrod Chutima, Charles Rotich, Karoly Nemeth |
| ||The Scientific World Journal. 2021; 2021: 1 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Fly ash as a raw material for low-carbon cement clinkers and its radiological properties
| ||Miljana Mirkovic, Ljiljana Kljajevic, Sneana Nenadovic, Sabina Dolenec, Katarina ter, Lea ibret, Milica Rajacic |
| ||Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry. 2021; 328(3): 1391 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Development of a reference material for analysing naturally occurring radioactive material from the steel industry
| ||E. Braysher, B. Russell, S.M. Collins, E.M. van Es, R. Shearman, F. Dal Molin, D. Read, M. Anagnostakis, R. Arndt, A. Bednár, T. Bituh, J.P. Bolivar, J. Cobb, N. Dehbi, S. Di Pasquale, C. Gascó, C. Gilligan, P. Jovanovic, A. Lawton, A.M.J. Lees, A. Lencsés, L. Mitchell, I. Mitsios, B. Petrinec, J. Rawcliffe, M. Shyti, J.A. Suárez-Navarro, S. Suursoo, E. Tóth-Bodrogi, T. Vaasma, L. Verheyen, J. Westmoreland, G. de With |
| ||Analytica Chimica Acta. 2021; 1141: 221 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Distribution of gamma radiation dose rate related with natural radionuclides in all of Vietnam and radiological risk assessment of the built-up environment
| ||Kazumasa Inoue, Masahiro Fukushi, Tan Van Le, Hiroshi Tsuruoka, Shogo Kasahara, Veerasamy Nimelan |
| ||Scientific Reports. 2020; 10(1) |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Radiological and health hazards resulting from radioactivity and elemental composition of some soil samples
| ||Abdu Hamoud Al-Khawlany, A. R. Khan, J. M. Pathan |
| ||Polish Journal of Medical Physics and Engineering. 2020; 26(2): 97 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|
||Using the RESRAD Code to Assess Human Exposure Risk to226Ra,232Th, and40K in Soil
| ||Shima Ziajahromi,Meysam Khanizadeh,Farhad Nejadkoorki |
| ||Human and Ecological Risk Assessment: An International Journal. 2014; : 00 |
|[Pubmed] | [DOI]|