Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India      
 Users online: 606  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 


 
 Table of Contents    
TECHNICAL NOTE
Year : 2017  |  Volume : 42  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 86-89
 

Intensities of incident and transmitted ultraviolet-a rays through gafchromic films


1 Faculty of Health Sciences, Butsuryo College of Osaka, Osaka, Japan
2 Department of Radiological Sciences, Ibaraki Prefectural University of Health Sciences, Ibaraki, Japan
3 Faculty of Health Sciences, Junshin Gakuen University, Fukuoka, Japan
4 Department of Radiological Technology, Tokushima Red Cross Hospital, Komatsushima, Japan
5 Graduate School of Health Sciences, Okayama University, Okayama, Japan
6 Graduate School of Medicine, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan

Date of Web Publication16-Jun-2017

Correspondence Address:
Toshizo Katsuda
Faculty of Health Sciences, Butsuryo College of Osaka, 3-33, Otorikita-machi Nishi-ku, Sakai-city, Osaka, 593-8328
Japan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/jmp.JMP_136_16

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 


Gafchromic films have been applied to X-ray dosimetry in diagnostic radiology. To correct nonuniformity errors in Gafchromic films, X-rays in the double-exposure technique can be replaced with ultraviolet (UV)-A rays. Intensities of the incident and transmitted UV-A rays were measured. However, it is unclear whether the chemical color change of Gafchromic films affects the UV-A transmission intensity. Gafchromic EBT3 films were suitable to be used in this study because non-UV protection layers are present on both sides of the film. The film is placed between UV-A ray light-emitting diodes and a probe of a UV meter. Gafchromic EBT3 films were irradiated by UV-A rays for up to 60 min. Data for analysis were obtained in the subsequent 60 min. Images from before and after UV-A irradiation were subtracted. When using 375 nm UV-A, the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of the pixel values in the subtracted image was remarkably high (11,194.15 ± 586.63). However, the UV-A transmissivity remained constant throughout the 60 min irradiation period. The mean ± SD UV-A transmission intensity was 184.48 ± 0.50 μm/cm2. Our findings demonstrate that color density changes in Gafchromic EBT3 films do not affect their UV-A transmission. Therefore, Gafchromic films were irradiated by UV-A rays as a preexposure.


Keywords: Diagnostic radiology, Gafchromic film, nonuniformity error, transmission intensity, ultraviolet


How to cite this article:
Katsuda T, Gotanda R, Gotanda T, Akagawa T, Tanki N, Kuwano T, Noguchi A, Yabunaka K. Intensities of incident and transmitted ultraviolet-a rays through gafchromic films. J Med Phys 2017;42:86-9

How to cite this URL:
Katsuda T, Gotanda R, Gotanda T, Akagawa T, Tanki N, Kuwano T, Noguchi A, Yabunaka K. Intensities of incident and transmitted ultraviolet-a rays through gafchromic films. J Med Phys [serial online] 2017 [cited 2019 Dec 13];42:86-9. Available from: http://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2017/42/2/86/208270



   Introduction Top


Gafchromic films are used for quality assurance, quality control,[1],[2] and radiation dosimetry during diagnostic examinations such as computed tomography.[3],[4] Nonuniformity errors in the active layer of Gafchromic EBT films are corrected by the double-exposure technique.[5] To resolve this problem, ultraviolet (UV)-A rays have been tried to use in diagnostic radiology.[6] Under UV irradiation, Gafchromic films are chemically polymerized and their color changes from transparent to dark blue.[7] UV-A rays emitted from a fluorescent lamp (peak wavelength 365 nm) react more effectively with Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 than do UV-B and UV-C (peak wavelength 320 nm and 245 nm [8]) rays.[9],[10]

X-ray absorption is unaffected by changes in color density in the Gafchromic film. In contrast, visible light absorption follows the Beer-Lambert law, indicating that color change directly affects the quantity of visible light absorption. Meanwhile, whether a chemical color change affects the UV-A absorption of Gafchromic films is unclear. Although the changing absorbed intensity of UV-A rays cannot be directly measured on Gafchromic films, it can be indirectly determined from the intensities of incident minus transmitted UV-A. This study reports the measurement of changing UV-A transmission intensities through the active layer of Gafchromic EBT3 films as a substitute of UV-A absorption.


   Materials and Methods Top


Ultraviolet-light-emitting diode, Gafchromic films, and measurement

The cannonball-type UV-A light-emitting diode (LED) series (Nitride Semiconductors Co., Ltd., Tokushima, Japan) was used in the experiments.[11] Irradiation wavelengths ranged from 360 to 400 nm in 5 nm increments, with an additional point at 353 nm [Table 1]. Wavelengths of the UV-A LEDs are listed in [Table 1]. Uniformity of the UV-A LED irradiation was within 80% of the peak intensity up to 7.5° from the isocenter. The Gafchromic EBT3 films (Lot# 04011401, expiry date: April 2016; Ashland Inc., Covington, KY, USA) were cut into trapezoidal shapes measuring 4.5 cm (top) and 5.5 cm (bottom). The Gafchromic EBT3 film without a UV protection layer was considered suitable for this study.[9] Moreover, the active layer (lithium pentacos-10, 12-diynate) of Gafchromic EBT3 can be considered representative of other Gafchromic films.[7]
Table 1: Wavelengths of ultraviolet light-emitting diodes

Click here to view


The intensities of incident and transmitted UV-A were measured by a UV meter (UVR-300 with a UD-360 probe [365 nm]; Topcon Technohouse Corporation, Tokyo, Japan) during 10 and 60 min of irradiation, respectively, and data were collected at 1 min intervals during each 10 min using BrightLoader 4 (Harvey Lab Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The UV-A LED, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and UV meter were fixed on acrylic boxes (Comoglas CG UV40 P, 3-mm thickness, Lot# 140406C B; Kuraray Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Positions of the UV-A LED, Gafchromic EBT3 film, and UV meter are shown in [Figure 1]a and [Figure 1]b.
Figure 1: Ultraviolet-A rays emitted from the light-emitting diodes pass through the Gafchromic EBT3 film and reach the ultraviolet meter. (a) Arrangement of the ultraviolet light-emitting diodes and ultraviolet measurement device (lateral view). The Gafchromic EBT3 film is placed between acrylic boxes A and B; (b) photograph of the measurement device and ultraviolet meter. The Gafchromic EBT3 film is taped to acrylic box B

Click here to view


Scans and data analysis

Scanning of the Gafchromic EBT3 films was performed as described by Katsuda et al. for EBT2 and EBT3 films [6] with reflection mode.[12] The moiré artifacts (Newton's rings) were reduced by designing a 5 μm gap of the matte polyester surface of the Gafchromic EBT3 film.[10] To reduce the artifact even surely, a sheet of overhead projector film and liquid crystal display was placed in the irradiation path. All films were scanned with and without irradiation by UV-A. In addition, to improve the reproducibility of the scan position of Gafchromic EBT3, a scan position sheet was attached to the surface of the scanner glass. The Gafchromic film was always scanned in the same direction (portrait mode with 180° rotation). All experiments were performed at the room temperature of within 21°C-25°C. Pixel values in the subtraction image were analyzed by ImageJ 1.44o for Macintosh (National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA). The subtraction image was constructed from the UV-A-irradiated image minus the non-UV-A-irradiated image. To measure pixel values, a region of interest (ROI; diameter 1.27 cm) was centered in the UV-A-irradiated region. The mean ± standard deviation (SD) pixel values in the ROI were identified by histogram analysis. The entire experiment was completed in 1 day.


   Results Top


Incident intensity of ultraviolet-A

The maximum incident intensity of UV-A was observed at 375 nm. The maximum, minimum, and mean ± SD of the incident intensities were 1430, 1420, and 1425 ± 5.27 μW/cm 2, respectively [Table 2]. In contrast, the minimum incident intensity of UV was observed at 400 nm. In this case, the maximum, minimum, and mean ± SD incident intensities of the UV rays were 13.9, 13.9, and 13.9 ± 1.87 μW/cm 2, respectively.
Table 2: Transmission intensities of ultraviolet-A

Click here to view


Transmission intensity of ultraviolet-A

The maximum, minimum, and mean ± SD of the 375 nm UV-A transmission intensities were 185.2, 183.4, and 184.48 ± 0.50 μW/cm 2, respectively, and those of 400 nm UV-A transmission intensity dose were 2.0, 1.9, and 1.90 ± 0.01 μW/cm 2, respectively [Table 2]. The UV-A transmission intensities through the Gafchromic EBT3 film remained constant throughout the measurement period. The chemical color change of the film did not affect the UV-A transmission intensity.

Pixel values of Gafchromic EBT3

The 375-nm UV-A irradiation generated the maximum pixel values of Gafchromic EBT3. The mean ± SD pixel values of the Gafchromic EBT3 film irradiated at 375 nm were 11,194.15 ± 586.63 [Table 3]. Normal and subtraction images with an ROI including the Gafchromic EBT3 film are shown in [Figure 2].
Table 3: Pixel values of subtracted images of the ultraviolet-A-irradiated Gafchromic EBT3 film

Click here to view
Figure 2: (a) Colored Gafchromic EBT3 film irradiated with 375-nm ultraviolet-A for up to 60 min and (b) subtraction image with region of interest indicated

Click here to view



   Discussion Top


Interpolation error of forward voltage

Wavelengths between 385 and 395 nm were emitted by changing the forward voltage of the LED. These wavelengths were higher than the original wavelength between 380 and 390 nm of UV rays; however, data on incident and transmission intensities were consistent.

Color-density increase and transmitted ultraviolet-A integrated intensity

The UV-A transmission intensities were measured at 1 min intervals during each 10 min by the UV meter. The color density was chemically altered in the final image. However, during irradiation by UV-A for 60 min, the transmission intensities of the Gafchromic EBT3 film remained unchanged at all tested wavelengths, indicating that the increase in color density does not affect UV-A transmission through the Gafchromic EBT3 film.

After irradiation with 365 and 375 nm UV-A rays, the mean ± SD pixel values were 11,361.03 ± 858.66 and 11,194.14 ± 586.62, respectively, which are remarkably high values than others. The corresponding mean ± SDs of the UV-A transmission intensities were 69.71 ± 0.12 and 184.48 ± 0.50 μW/cm 2, respectively. Therefore, the transmission intensity of UV-A can be considered as being stable.

Selection of region of interest

According to the manufacturer's specification, more than 80% of the intensity is concentrated within 7.5° of the isocenter. Therefore, an area measuring 1.27 cm was chosen as the ROI for evaluation.

Ultraviolet protection

As UV-rays are harmful for the human body,[13] the UV-A irradiation experiment was performed in UV-irradiation boxes constructed from UV reduced acrylic plates.


   Conclusion Top


The relation between chemical color changes (pixel value) and UV-A transmission intensity in the Gafchromic EBT3 film was investigated. Transmission intensities were constant during 60 min of irradiation by UV-A LEDs. This indicates that the UV-A transmissions through the Gafchromic EBT3 film, regardless of chemical color change, were consistent. Therefore, UV-A can be used for irradiation as preexposure for Gafchromic films.

Financial support and sponsorship

This study was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 26460740.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.

 
   References Top

1.
Rampado O, Garelli E, Deagostini S, Ropolo R. Dose and energy dependence of response of Gafchromic XR-QA film for kilovoltage X-ray beams. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:2871-81.  Back to cited text no. 1
[PUBMED]    
2.
Gotanda R, Katsuda T, Gotanda T, Eguchi M, Takewa S, Tabuchi A, et al. Computed tomography phantom for radiochromic film dosimetry. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2007;30:194-9.  Back to cited text no. 2
[PUBMED]    
3.
Liao YL, Kao HC, Chuang KS, Chen CP, Tsai HY. CT dose estimation using Gafchromic XR-CT film: Models comparison. Radiat Meas 2011;46:2052-5.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Gotanda T, Katsuda T, Gotanda R, Tabuchi A, Yamamoto K, Kuwano T, et al. Evaluation of effective energy using radiochromic film and a step-shaped aluminum filter. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2011;34:213-22.  Back to cited text no. 4
[PUBMED]    
5.
Zhu Y, Kirov AS, Mishra V, Meigooni AS, Williamson JF. Quantitative evaluation of radiochromic film response for two-dimensional dosimetry. Med Phys 1997;24:223-31.  Back to cited text no. 5
[PUBMED]    
6.
Katsuda T, Gotanda R, Gotanda T, Akagawa T, Tanki N, Kuwano T, et al. Correction of nonuniformity error of Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2016;17:41-51.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
ISO. Space environment (natural and artificial) - Process for determining solar irradiance. ISO 21348:2007. Geneva: International Organization for Standardization; 2007.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Lewis FD. A Guide to Radiochromic Film Dosimetry with EBT2 and EBT3. Advanced Materials Group, Ashland Specialty Ingredients, Spain, April 2014.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Katsuda T, Gotanda R, Gotanda T, Akagawa T, Tanki N, Kuwano T, et al. Comparing three UV wavelengths for pre-exposing Gafchromic EBT2 and EBT3 films. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2015;16:449-57.  Back to cited text no. 9
[PUBMED]    
10.
Aydarous A, Al-Omary EA, Ghazaly ME. Characterization of Gafchromic EBT3 films for ultraviolet radiation. Radiat Eff Defects Solid 2014;169:249-55.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Nitride Data Sheets. Nitride Semiconductors Co., Ltd.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Gotanda T, Katsuda T, Akagawa T, Gotanda R, Tabuchi A, Yamamoto K, et al. Evaluation of GAFCHROMIC EBT2 dosimetry for the low dose range using a flat-bed scanner with the reflection mode. Australas Phys Eng Sci Med 2013;36:59-63.  Back to cited text no. 12
[PUBMED]    
13.
de Gruijl FR. Skin cancer and solar UV radiation. Eur J Cancer 1999;35:2003-9.  Back to cited text no. 13
[PUBMED]    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2], [Table 3]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
  

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (621 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
   Results
   Discussion
   Conclusion
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed800    
    Printed14    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded49    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal