Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of Association of Medical Physicists of India      
 Users online: 580  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 


 
 Table of Contents    
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
Year : 2015  |  Volume : 40  |  Issue : 1  |  Page : 13-17
 

Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for 32 P patch source for superficial brachytherapy applications


1 Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India
2 Isotope Production and Applications Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai, Maharashtra, India

Date of Submission29-Sep-2014
Date of Decision14-Jan-2015
Date of Acceptance14-Jan-2015
Date of Web Publication27-Feb-2015

Correspondence Address:
Sridhar Sahoo
Radiological Physics and Advisory Division, CT CRS Building, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400 094,
India
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/0971-6203.152232

Rights and Permissions

 

   Abstract 

Skin cancer treatment involving 32 P source is an easy, less expensive method of treatment limited to small and superficial lesions of approximately 1 mm deep. Bhabha Atomic Research Centre (BARC) has indigenously developed 32 P nafion-based patch source (1 cm Χ 1 cm) for treating skin cancer. For this source, the values of dose per unit activity at different depths including dose profiles in water are calculated using the EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo code system. For an initial activity of 1 Bq distributed in 1 cm 2 surface area of the source, the calculated central axis depth dose values are 3.62 Χ 10 -10 GyBq -1 and 8.41 Χ 10 -11 GyBq -1 at 0.0125 and 1 mm depths in water, respectively. Hence, the treatment time calculated for delivering therapeutic dose of 30 Gy at 1 mm depth along the central axis of the source involving 37 MBq activity is about 2.7 hrs.


Keywords: 32 P patch; brachytherapy; dosimetry; nafion; skin cancer


How to cite this article:
Sahoo S, Palani ST, Saxena S K, Babu D, Dash A. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for 32 P patch source for superficial brachytherapy applications. J Med Phys 2015;40:13-7

How to cite this URL:
Sahoo S, Palani ST, Saxena S K, Babu D, Dash A. Monte Carlo-based dose calculation for 32 P patch source for superficial brachytherapy applications. J Med Phys [serial online] 2015 [cited 2019 Apr 23];40:13-7. Available from: http://www.jmp.org.in/text.asp?2015/40/1/13/152232



   Introduction Top


Basal cell carcinoma is one of the most common skin cancers, occurs mostly in middle aged people, and is more probable for the fair complexion people. [1] The treatment modalities for skin cancers are surgical excision, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Each treatment modality has its own advantages and disadvantages. Removing the affected area by surgical excision is usually preferred in many cases, but the recurrence rates after treatment are high. Radiotherapy treatment using external beam therapy is too expensive and it also delivers unnecessary dose to underlying normal tissues. Chemotherapy has its own side effects.

Mould or superficial brachytherapy is a promising alternative treatment method for such skin cancers, where high-energy beta emitting radio-nuclides such as 32 P, 90 Sr/ 90 Y, 188 Re are used to overcome the disadvantages of radiotherapy and surgery. In superficial brachytherapy, prescribed dose can be delivered to the affected area without excessive damage to the neighboring normal tissues. This technique is simple, less trauma to patients, and less expensive as compared to external beam therapy.

Lee et al., introduced the treatment of skin cancer and Bowen's disease using beta emitting 165 Ho-impregnated patch sources. [2] Successful tumor destruction was observed both in animal and human studies. Mukherjee et al., in their studies evaluated 90 Y skin patches and 188 Re radioactive bandages for therapy of superficial tumors in mice. [3],[4] Treatment of skin cancer using 188 Re-labeled paper patches has been reported by Jeong et al. [5]

Pandey et al., reported the use of 32 P cellulose-based adsorbent paper skin patches to control the tumor regression in C57BL6 mice bearing melanoma. [6] Park et al., [7] studied the use of 32 P ophthalmic applicator after pterygium and glaucoma surgeries. They demonstrated that dose distributions obtained using the 32 P source is beneficial for reducing the incidence rate of radiation-induced cataract and it can deliver therapeutic doses to the surface of the conjunctiva while sparing the lens better than the 90 Sr/ 90 Y applicators. Xu et al., [8] investigated the therapeutic effects of the chromic phosphate particle-based 32 P source in a rabbit VX 2 lung tumor animal model and found that the tumor volume significantly decreased after implantation of source particle.

Salguerio et al., designed 32 P brachytherapy patch source (1 mm in height × 5 mm in dia.) for skin diseases using phosphoric acid and chromic phosphate in combination with natural rubber or silicone and evaluated its therapeutic efficacy. [9],[10] They reported arrest of tumor growth and complete regression of tumor in some cases with 40 Gy of single-dose scheme in animal studies. They estimated the dose rate at selected depths (0.0001, 0.01, 4 and 7.5 mm) using the Monte Carlo-based MCNP5 code. [10],[11] The activity per unit area considered in their calculations was 10.6 MBqcm -2 . The surface area of the source was 0.196 cm 2 . Hence, the total activity of the source considered in their work was 2.081 MBq. We repeated their study using the DOSRZnrc user-code. [12] The dose rate values showed a good agreement for 0.0001 and 0.01 mm depths. For 4 and 7.5 mm depths, the published values were higher by a factor of about 22 and 3.6 × 10 4 , respectively. We concluded that this large discrepancy in the dose rate values at 4 and 7.5 mm depths published by Salguerio et al., [9] was due to possible systematic error in their Monte Carlo calculations. [13]

32
P is a suitable radioisotope for such therapeutic application due to many advantages over other beta emitting radioisotopes. It is a pure beta emitter with maximum energy of 1.71 MeV. Its half-life is 14.2 days. Hence it is less hazardous material from transportation, storage, and waste disposal point of view. The maximum range of 32 P beta particle in soft tissue is 8 mm (the average range is 3 mm). [14] Due to its short range, there will be negligible radiation dose to the underlying healthy normal tissues and bone.

Isotope Production and Applications Division, BARC has indigenously developed nafion-zirconium phosphate film-based 32 P patch source for superficial brachytherapy applications. [15] A nafion-117 membrane of thickness 100 μm is treated with ZrOCl 2 solution, and subsequently dipped in orthophosphoric acid. These radioactive 32 P patches are cut in to 1 cm × 1 cm sizes and then subsequently laminated with thermoplastic polyurethane sheets of thickness 40 μm. The above preparation method is robust, inexpensive and reproducible and complies with the safety standard stipulated by Atomic Energy Regulatory Board, India. [16] The detailed preparation of nafion-117 patches is explained by Saxena et al. [15]

The present study is aimed at calculating central axis depth dose and dose profiles in water phantom for the indigenously developed 32 P-nafion-based patch source. For this purpose, the EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo code system is used. [17] Based on the calculated dose rate data, the treatment time to deliver a therapeutic dose of 30 Gy at reference depth is also calculated, as per the IAEA-tecdoc-1274. [18]


   Materials and Methods Top


Monte Carlo calculations

DOSXYZnrc user-code [19] of the EGSnrc-code system [17] is used to calculate central axis depth doses and dose profiles in the unit density water medium for simulating the 1 cm × 1 cm 32 P-nafion-patch source. The 1 cm × 1 cm 32 P-nafion-patch source is positioned on 2 × 2 ×2 cm 3 water phantom. The thickness of source is 100 μm. The geometry and co-ordinate system used in the Monte Carlo calculations is shown in [Figure 1]. The elemental composition and density of phosphorous-loaded zirconium-nafion-117 composite membrane used in the Monte Carlo calculation is given in [Table 1]. [15]
Figure 1: (a) Schematic diagram of the 32P-nafion-patch source and water phantom used in the DOSXYZnrc Monte Carlo simulation. (b) Coordinate system used in the simulation

Click here to view
Table 1: Elemental composition of phosphorous-loaded zirconium-nafion-117 composite membrane (density=1620 kgm−3)


Click here to view


The 32 P beta spectrum [see [Figure 2]] needed for the Monte Carlo calculation is based on ICRU Report No. 56. [20] In the Monte Carlo calculations, it is considered that the source particles are uniformly distributed in the nafion patch of dimensions 1 cm × 1 cm × 100 μm. The water phantom was divided in to voxels of dimension of 0.25 × 0.25 × 0.25 mm 3 for generating dose profiles. Dose distributions in water are scored in these voxels. Separate simulation is carried out to score central axis depth dose by using bigger voxel dimensions (2 × 2× 0.25 mm 3 ).
Figure 2: 32P beta spectrum used in the Monte Carlo simulation

Click here to view


In the Monte Carlo calculations, all secondary particles such as knock on electrons and secondary bremsstrahlung photons produced by primary source electrons are completely followed in the simulation. The PEGS4 dataset needed for EGSnrc calculations is based on the XCOM compilations. [21] The PEGS4 dataset is generated by setting AE = ECUT = 0.521 MeV and AP = PCUT = 0.01 MeV, where the parameters AE and AP are the low energy thresholds for the production of knock-on electrons and secondary bremsstrahlung photons, respectively.

All Monte Carlo simulations utilized the PRESTA-II algorithm. The electron step-size parameter is set at ESTEP = 0.25. To increase the speed of the calculations, electron range rejection technique was used by setting ESAVE = 2 MeV. Auxiliary simulation was also carried without range rejection. The calculations suggest that using the range rejection with ESAVE = 2 MeV, improves the efficiency of the calculations by about 40%. In order to know the effect of boundary crossing algorithm on computational time, both PRESTA-I and EXACT boundary crossing algorithms were used in the calculations. The study shows that the using the PRESTA-I option results in improving the efficiency of the calculations by a factor 2 when compared to using the EXACT boundary-crossing algorithm. This observation is consistent with the findings by Walters and Kawrakow in their EGSnrc-based Monte Carlo study involving radiotherapy electron beams. [22]


   Results and Discussion Top


The variation of the dose values per unit activity (GyBq -1 ) as a function of depth (mm) in water for the 32 P-nafion-patch source is shown in [Figure 3]. The dose decreases rapidly with increasing depth in water. Central axis dose at 4 mm depth in water is only 0.08% of the central axis surface dose. Such a rapid decrease in dose will result in better sparing of the normal tissues.
Figure 3: Depth dose distribution of 32P-nafion-patch source along the central axis of the source

Click here to view


[Table 2] compares the values of central axis depth dose per unit activity (GyBq -1 ) of 32 P-nafion-patch source with the corresponding values of 32 P-silicon-patch [9] for different depths in water. Higher dose rate values are observed in the case of 32 P-silicon-patch source, because the radioactivity is distributed in lesser surface area (0.196 cm 2 ) as compared to 32 P-nafion-patch source, where surface area is 1 cm 2 .
Table 2: Comparison of dose values per unit activity (GyBq−1) presented as a function of depth in water


Click here to view


For treatment time calculation, 1 mm depth from the surface along the central axis of the source is considered as reference depth. [18] The value of dose in water calculated at 1 mm from the source surface is 8.41 × 10 -11 GyBq -1 . Hence, the time required to deliver a therapeutic dose of 30 Gy for a 37 MBq of radioactivity distributed in 1 cm 2 of 32 P-nafion-patch source is about 2.7 hours.

[Figure 4] presents the dose rate profiles along the x-axis of 32 P-nafion-patch source for three different depths z = 0.5, 1 and 2 mm from the source surface. [Figure 5] presents normalized dose values along the x-axis at depth 1 mm. The central axis dose value at 1 mm depth is used for normalization. Dose rate value at 3.5 mm away from the central axis is about 91% of the central axis value. Whereas dose rate at 5 mm away from the central axis is only 50% of the central axis value. [Figure 6] [Figure 7] [Figure 8] show isodose profiles of the 32 P-nafion-patch source at depths of 0.5, 1, and 2 mm. About 3.25-3.5 mm distance around the central axis is covered by about 90% isodose line for depths of 0.5, 1, and 2 mm. Hence, the 32 P-nafion-patch source is effective for treatment of approximately 6.5-7.0 mm diameter lesions.
Figure 4: Dose profile along the x-axis of 32P-nafion-patch source for different depths, z = 0.5 mm, z = 1 mm and z = 2 mm

Click here to view
Figure 5: Normalized dose profile along the x-axis of 32P-nafion-patch source for depth z = 1 mm

Click here to view
Figure 6: Isodose profiles of the 32P-nafion-patch source on xy-plane at a depth of 0.5 mm

Click here to view
Figure 7: Isodose profiles of the 32P-nafion-patch source on xy-plane at a depth of 1 mm

Click here to view
Figure 8: Isodose profiles of the 32P-nafion-patch source on xy-plane at a depth of 2 mm

Click here to view



   Conclusions Top


Dose distributions for the indigenously developed 1 cm × 1 cm 32 P-nafion skin patch source are calculated using the Monte Carlo-based EGSnrc code system. The calculated treatment time for delivering therapeutic dose of 30 Gy at 1 mm depth along the central axis of the source involving 37 MBq activity is about 2.7 hrs. This source is effective for treatment of approximately 6.5-7.0 mm diameter lesions.


   Acknowledgments Top


The authors would like to thank Dr. D. N. Sharma, Formerly Director, Health, Safety and Environment Group, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre for his encouragement and support for this work.

 
   References Top

1.
Kopf AW. Computer analysis of 3531 basal cell carcinomas of the skin. J Dermatol 1979;6:267.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Lee JD, Park KK, Lee MG, Kim EH, Rhim KJ, Lee JT, et al. Radionuclide therapy of skin cancers and Bowen's disease using a specially designed skin patch. J Nucl Med 1997;38:697-702.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Mukherjee A, Pandey U, Sarma HD, Pillai MR, Venkatesh M. Preparation and evaluation of 90 Y skin patches for therapy of superficial tumors in mice. Nucl Med Commun 2002;23:243-7.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Mukherjee A, Pandey U, Sarma HD, Gupta SK, Ingle AD, Pillai MR, et al. Bioevaluation of radioactive bandages in a murine model of melanoma. Int J Radiat Biol 2003;79:839-45.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Jeong JM, Lee YJ, Kim EH, Chang YS, Kim YJ, Son M, et al. Preparation of 188 Re labeled paper for treating skin cancer. Appl Radiat Isot 2003;58:551-5.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Pandey U, Saxena SK, Sarma HD, Tandon P, Ram R, Samuel G, et al. Bioevaluation studies of 32 P incorporated mould brachytherapy sources for potential application in treatment of superficial tumors. Nucl Med Commun 2008;29:717-23.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Park YK, Ye SJ, Kim IH, Wee WR, Kim MK, Han HS, et al. Potential use of 32 P ophthalmic applicator: Monte Carlo simulations for design and dosimetry. Med Phys 2008;35:1854-8.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Xu YP, Yang M, Pan Dh, Wang Lz, Liu L, Huang P, et al. Bioevaluation study of 32 P-CP-PLLA particle brachytherapy in a rabbit VX2 lung tumor model. Appl Radiat Isot 2012;70:583-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Salgueiro MJ, Duran H, Palmieri M, Pirchio R, Nicolini J, Ughetti R, et al. Design and bioevaluation of a 32 P-patch for brachytherapy of skin diseases. Appl Radiat Isot 2008;66:303-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Salgueiro MJ, Duran H, Palmieri M, Pirchio R, Medina V, Ughetti R, et al. Bioevaluation of 32 P patch designed for the treatment of skin diseases. Nucl Med Biol 2008;35:233-7.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
X-5 Monte Carlo Team. MCNP-A General Monte Carlo N-Particle Transport Code, Version 5. Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM, USA; 2003.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Rogers DWO, Kawrakow I, Seuntjens JP, Walters B, Mainegra-Hing E. NRC user codes for EGSnrc, NRCC Report No. PIRS-702 (rev. B). National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 2010.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Sahoo S, Palani Selvam T. Comment on "Design and bioevaluation of a 32 P-patch for brachytherapy of skin diseases" [Appl. Radiat. Isot 66, (2008) 303-309]. Appl Radiat Isot 2014;91:62-3.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Gao W, Liu L, Liu ZY, Li XD, Li C. Interstitial injection of 32 P-chromic phosphate during lung cancer resection to treat occult lymphatic metastasis. Nucl Med Commun 2009;30:420-6.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
Saxena SK, Kumar Y, Dash A. Nafion-zirconium phosphate composite membrane: A new approach to prepare 32 P patches for superficial brachytherapy applications. Cancer Biother Radiopharm 2012;27:276-84.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Testing and classification of sealed radioactive sources. AERB Safety Standard No. AERB/SS/3 (Rev. 1); 2001.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Kawrakow I, Seuntjens JP, Rogers DW, Tessier F, Walters BR. The EGSnrc code system: Monte Carlo simulation of electron and photon transport, NRCC Report No. PIRS-701. National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 2013.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
IAEA-Tecdoc-1274. Calibration of photon and beta ray sources used in brachytherapy. March; 2002.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Walters B, Kawrakow I, Rogers DWO. DOSXYZnrc users manual, NRCC Report PIRS-794 (rev. B). National Research Council of Canada, Ottawa, Canada; 2009.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
ICRU Report No. 56. Dosimetry of external beta rays for radiation protection, International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, Bethesda, MD; 1997.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Berger MJ, Hubbell, JH. XCOM, Photon cross sections on a personal computer, Report no. NBSIR 87-3597. Gaithersburg, MD. NIST; 1987.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Walters BR, Kawrakow I. Technical note: Overprediction of dose with default PRESTA-I boundary crossing in DOSXYZnrc and BEAMnrc. Med Phys 2007;34:647-50.  Back to cited text no. 22
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3], [Figure 4], [Figure 5], [Figure 6], [Figure 7], [Figure 8]
 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1], [Table 2]



 

Top
Print this article  Email this article
  

    

 
   Search
 
  
    Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
    Article in PDF (1,063 KB)
    Citation Manager
    Access Statistics
    Reader Comments
    Email Alert *
    Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)  


    Abstract
   Introduction
    Materials and Me...
    Results and Disc...
   Conclusions
   Acknowledgments
    References
    Article Figures
    Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1895    
    Printed44    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded221    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal