Journal of Medical Physics
 Home | Search | Ahead of print | Current Issue | Archives | Instructions | Subscription | Login  The official journal of AMPI, IOMP and AFOMP      
 Users online: 68  Home  EMail this page Print this page Decrease font size Default font size Increase font size 
Year : 1997  |  Volume : 22  |  Issue : 2  |  Page : 25-29

Radiation Protection And Dosimetry For Patients In Diagnostic Radiology In The UK - NRPB's Role

Correspondence Address:
Barry F Wall

Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None

Rights and PermissionsRights and Permissions

The large potential for patient dose reduction in the UK became evident when a nation patient dose survey conducted by NRPB in the early 1980s, revealed wide variations in practice. NRPB then collaborated with the professional organisations of radiologists, radiographers and medical physicists to produce advisory documents on patient dose reduction and measurement in diagnostic radiology. They included guideline reference doses for common types of examination against which X-ray departments could compare their performance. Following this advice, the results of over 50,000 patient dose measurements made at 375 hospitals were sent to. NRPB's national database by the end of 1995. The mean doses for each type of examination were seen to have fallen by about 30% since the earlier survey and only about 10% of hospitals still exceed the reference dose levels, indicating a substantial saving in the collective dose to the population from medical X-rays. However, the rapid increase in the use of high-dose computed tomography (CT) over the past decade has led to an increase in the collective dose, which will more than overweigh the reduction observed for conventional X-ray examinations. Correct application of the ICRP radiation protection principles of justification and optimisation does not necessarily require a lowering of the collective dose from such a potentially beneficial use of ionising radiation as diagnostic radiology. To maximise the margin of benefit over harm may require greater provision of diagnostic radiology services in appropriate areas resulting in a higher collective dose but a higher net health benefit to the population.

Print this article     Email this article
 Next article
 Previous article
 Table of Contents

 Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Citation Manager
 Access Statistics
 Reader Comments
 Email Alert *
 Add to My List *
 * Requires registration (Free)

 Article Access Statistics
    PDF Downloaded191    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal